<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Data Quality on Andrew Stryker</title><link>https://axs.sdf.org/tags/data-quality/</link><description>Recent content in Data Quality on Andrew Stryker</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>andrewjstryker@proton.me (Andrew Stryker)</managingEditor><webMaster>andrewjstryker@proton.me (Andrew Stryker)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://axs.sdf.org/tags/data-quality/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Theoretical Foundations of the Warehouse Ontology</title><link>https://axs.sdf.org/2026/03/30/theoretical-foundations-of-the-warehouse-ontology/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>andrewjstryker@proton.me (Andrew Stryker)</author><guid>https://axs.sdf.org/2026/03/30/theoretical-foundations-of-the-warehouse-ontology/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="https://axs.sdf.org/2026/03/30/an-ontology-of-data-warehouse-layers/"&gt;warehouse layer ontology&lt;/a&gt;
assigns each layer a single correctness guarantee. The idea is not new &amp;mdash; it
extends work that already exists at smaller scales.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="codds-relational-integrity-constraints"&gt;Codd&amp;rsquo;s Relational Integrity Constraints&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Codd&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/16301.16303"&gt;relational integrity constraints&lt;/a&gt; showed that correctness within
a single database is not monolithic but &lt;em&gt;stratified&lt;/em&gt;: domain constraints (each
value in range), entity integrity (each row identifiable), and referential
integrity (cross-table relationships consistent) form a hierarchy where each
level presupposes the one below it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>